no better than bacteria

The agenda of many Darwinian evolutionary biologists has been assumed to be political and not pure science for quite some time now. This is why some of them continue to bring school systems to court to try to stop schools from allowing teachers to talk about the weaknesses and challenges to Darwinian evolution. I am so used to the misinformation that is being spread through mainstream news that nothing really shocks me anymore when it comes to the agenda of some Darwinists. Except this. Which happens to be a true story. I still haven’t seen it in mainstream media. Yet…


Eric Pianka, University of Texas biologist, just received the distinguished Texas Scientist award from the Texas Academy of Science last month. He had the videotape of the award’s ceremony shut off before he gave his speech. There were tape recorders in the room, though, so one gets to hear what went on anyway. Hence, you understand the turning off of the videotape.

Dr. Pianka advocated that it would be a good thing if some group of people would spread the Ebola virus so that 90% of the world’s population would die. In this way, the planet earth would better survive the rages of humanity. Dr. Pianka said this about humans.

“We’re no better than bacteria!”

This is not a joke. Witnesses and the taped evidence confirm it. The most unbelievable news of all, is this. After this speech, Dr. Pianka was given a standing ovation from the members of the Texas Academy of Science!!

So, if you are a Darwinian evolutionist and you think those of us who question that Darwinian mechanisms are the sole explanation for all things scientific, and we say you are holding on to some teaching that is not science, but philosophy, and we say we are concerned by some of the strong political aggressiveness you exhibit to prevent simply following the evidence wherever it leads or questioning any of the teachings of Darwinian evolution using science to critique. This is some of the non-science stuff coming from your "camp" that is frightening.

If you are in this camp and agree with Dr. Pianka, I’ll continue to debate the science, if you will actually sit down at the table and talk about it. But when it comes to philosophy, I think I have a superior view of reality and it is time you consider what I have to say before you start killing my fellow humans, whom I love and respect.

In the meantime, I need to hear the condemnation of this viewpoint by other Darwinian scientists. I will be watching the net for responses. I would argue this is a make or break time for open and honest Darwinian evolutionists to speak up.